Hamlet by William Shakespeare Essay Example for Free

Hamlet by William Shakespeare Essay Hamlet is a story by William Shakespeare written in 1599. This story is about Prince Hamlet’s struggles after his father’s death. Hamlet seeks revenge from his uncle for his father’s death. His uncle, Claudius sees Hamlet as a threat to his power, so he attempts to get rid of him. Unfortunately, his plan backfires, and the whole royal family dies, including Hamlet. An animated children’s Disney movie, The Lion King created in 1994, reflects Hamlet. The Lion King starts with a lion cub, Simba, who is learning the responsibilities of a king. Scar, Simba\s uncle has the desire to become the king. In order, to fulfill his dream, Scar kills king Mufasa and blames Simba. Scared and guilty Simba runs away, but returns soon after to take over his responsibility and become king. The Lion King is like a reproduction of the play Hamlet. The stories are similar and different in many ways. Here I have listed a few of many. The Hamlet and The Lion King have a lot in similar. In both of the stories, the uncle is the villain who seeks power. Simba and Hamlet both lose their fathers to what they believe is an unfortunate accident. Both of the main characters seek revenge for their father\s death and eventually kill their uncles. They are both from a royal family and the rightful heir to the throne. The characters are very similar and so is the plot. The queens, Sarabi and Gertrude have little to no power in the kingdom. Scar and Claudius are portrayed as cold and evil. Simba and Hamlet are presented as thoughtful, intelligent and emotional. Although the stories are known to have similarities, they have a lot of differences too. The most prominent difference is that Hamlet dies at the end of Hamlet, whereas the Lion King has a happy ending. Simba marries Nala and has a baby. In the Lion King, Simba is framed for Mufasa\s death so he chooses to run away, however, in Hamlet, Claudius orders Hamlet to go to England. Claudius rules pretty well, he does not ruin the kingdom like Scar. After his father\s death, Simba lives a carefree life for some years, whereas Hamlet is depressed, and on the verge of madness. Also, in Hamlet Polonius is Ophelia\s father, however in the Lion King, Zazu is not related to Nala. The differences are what make the stories unique. Disney recreated Shakespeare\s Hamlet into an animated children\s movie to make it suitable for children. They could have copied all of it, but then kids would not have liked it. The language of Hamlet is difficult to understand, whereas the Lion King uses modern words. Lion King creators did not kill Simba in the end because kids like to see happy endings. Movies created for kids should not be depressing. They put a family feeling in the movie, so more people would watch it and they would make more profit. The Lion King had a moral, like other Disney movies. Here the moral was, you have to learn to step up and keep moving forward, instead of running from your past. In my opinion, both of the stories were quite entertaining and well thought of. Disney did a great job with changing the story. They kept the major similarities but changed Shakespeare\s work into their own words. Hamlet’s tragic ending and The Lion King\s delightful ending make them remarkable. They are stories worth knowing.

The Political Career of Richard Nixon Essay -- essays research papers

Richard Nixon served as the 37th president of the United States. He is well known for the infamous Watergate scandal and was remembered by the American people as the first president to resign from office. However, he is also undoubtedly one of the most influential political figures when it comes to guiding the nation through one of its toughest time periods in history, as well as breaking the ice on foreign diplomacy with socialist countries such as China and the Soviet Union. Despite his downfall involving the Watergate Hotel, he had dedicated a tremendous amount of effort in domestic and world politics; and made numerous contributions during his life as a politician, which would give enough reason for future historians to believe that the second half of the twentieth century is truly â€Å"the age of Nixon†. Richard Milhous Nixon was born into a poor family on January 9, 1913, in Yorba Linda, California, and was raised in the nearby small town of Whittier. His mother, Hannah Milhous, was well educated and a religious member of the Quaker Society, while his father Francis Anthony Nixon was uneducated, had no steady jobs, and was accused of being quarrelsome with nearly everyone around him (American President, http://www.americanpresident.org/history/). Nixon was very introvert as a child. He had a difficult early life with series of hardships, which made a lasting effect on his character and personality. He did not fit in with most of his peers and had a lifelong difficulty of trusting people outside of his family (Nixon, 1978, 5-15). His anger was kept inside of him, which motivated him to develop a sense of competition and struggle, and inspired him to excel in school. He became the valedictorian of his grammar school and was an excellent debater in Whittier High School. It was also the re that he met first long-term girlfriend, Ola Florence Welch. Ola Florence was known for her beauty and strong character, with a brain to match. The two quickly fell in love and stayed together for six years. Ola Florence became engaged to Nixon in 1933. However, their romance fizzled as Ola Florence broke off their engagement in 1935 (Aitken, 1993, 58-65). Nixon studied at Whittier College in California and graduated in 1934. He went on to pursue his study of law at Duke University Law School in North Carolina. After graduating third in his class in 1937 (American President,... ...2004) -----. â€Å"Nixon’s China Visit†. http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/ziliao/3602/3604/t18006.htm (March 12, 2004) -----. â€Å"Who Said That?†. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/china/sfeature/wst_q3b.html   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  (March 15, 2004) -----. â€Å"U.S. Presidential Election, 1972†.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election%2C_1972 (March 14, 2004) -----. â€Å"Watergate Chronology, 1971-1972†. http://www.watergate.info/chronology/1972.shtml   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  (March 14, 2004) -----. â€Å"Watergate Chronology, 1973†. http://www.watergate.info/chronology/1973.shtml   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  (March 14, 2004) Aitken, Jonathan. 1993. Nixon: A Life. London, Great Britain: Butler & Tanner Ltd. Lewis, Alfred E. â€Å"Washington Post, June 18, 1972†.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/watergate/articles/061872-1.htm   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  (March 16, 2004) Nixon, Richard. â€Å"Nixon’s Resignation Speech†. http://www.watergate.info/nixon/resignation-speech.shtml (March 17, 2004) Nixon, Richard. 1978. The Memoirs of Richard Nixon. New York: Grossett & Dunlap Publishers.

Migration Skills Assessment Booklet

MIGRATION SKILLS ASSESSMENT fOR REcOGNITION Of pERSONS INTENdING TO AppLy fOR SKILLEd MIGRATION TO AuSTRALIA wIThIN ThE ENGINEERING pROfESSION July 2012 www. engineersaustralia. org. au Migration Skills Assessment Education and Assessment Engineers Australia, 11 National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600 AUSTRALIA  © Copyright Engineers Australia, 2012 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from Engineers Australia.Requests and inquiries concerning the reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Director Education and Assessment, Engineers Australia, 11 National Circuit Barton ACT 2600 cONTENTS CONTENTS SECTION A Introduction and Background Introduction 1. Assessment for Migration Purposes 2. Occupational Categories in Engineering 3. Pathways to Recognition 4. English Language Requirements 5. Certification of Copies of Documents 6. Steps in the Assessment Applicatio n Process 7. Application Forms 8. The Assessment Process 9.Appealing the Assessment Outcome SECTION B Assessment of Recognised Qualifications 1. Australian Qualifications 2. Washington Accord 3. Sydney Accord SECTION C Assessment of Non-Recognised Qualifications 1. Introduction 2. Steps in preparing a CDR 3. Components of the CDR Summary Statements Professional Engineer Engineering Technologist Engineering Associate Engineering Manager SECTION D Additional Assessment Services 1. Introduction 2. Applicability of additional services 3. Identification of higher level engineering qualifications 4. Work Experience SECTION E Checklists, Fee Payment and Dispatch 1.Checklists 27 28 2. Fee Payment and Dispatch APPENDIX Detailed Description of Competency Elements for each Occupational Category Professional Engineer Engineering Technologist Engineering Associate Engineering Manager ANZSCO occupations designated to Engineers Australia 32 37 42 46 48 24 24 24 25 18 19 20 21 14 14 14 10 10 11 4 4 5 5 5 6 7 7 7 1 2 SEcTION A Introduction and Background 3 SEcTION A Introduction This booklet has been developed by Engineers Australia to assist you in preparing your submission for an engineering qualifications assessment.This section provides you with an introduction to the assessment of qualifications in engineering for migration purposes. You should read this booklet carefully before proceeding to the Application Forms. Professional Engineer Academic qualification is an Australian four year Bachelor of Engineering degree following twelve years of schooling, or equivalent. The Professional Engineer: †¢ Focusesonoverallsystems †¢ Developsandappliesnewengineeringpractices †¢ Appliesleadership&managementskills †¢ Pursuesengineeringopportunitiesinanholisticway,taking environmental,community&socialissuesintoaccount †¢ Solvesdiverseproblems.Engineering Technologist Academic qualification is an Australian three year Bachelor of Engineering Technology degree fo llowing twelve years of schooling, or equivalent. The Engineering Technologist: †¢ Focusesoninteractionswithinthesystem †¢ Modifiesandadaptsestablishedengineeringpractices †¢ Advancesengineeringtechnology. Engineering Associate Academic qualification is an Australian two year Advanced Diploma of engineering following twelve years of schooling, or equivalent. The Engineering Associate: †¢ Focusesonspecificelementsofthesystem †¢Workswithincodesandappliesestablished practices and procedures. Engineering Manager An engineering or engineering-related academic qualification must be held – normally at Bachelor degree level or higher. Engineering Manager: †¢ is a high level position involving the formulation of engineering strategies, policies and plans and the direction, administration and review of engineering operations for an organization †¢ musthavearecordofseniormanagementovera period of three years or more.Letters of reference and organisatio nal charts must be provided †¢ musthavepersonsreportingtohim/herwhoare also at a management level. Applicants should note that this occupation is not an engineering occupation, but rather belongs to the Managers and Administrators’ category. Consequently, a positive outcome will not allow automatic membership of Engineers Australia. Further details on the general role descriptions for each occupational category are presented in the Appendix. 1. Assessment for Migration Purposes Engineers Australia is the designated assessing authority for most engineering occupations.You should first check the ‘Skilled Occupation Lists (SOL)’ to determine that your skilled occupation is listed as being assessable by Engineers Australia, as there are some engineering occupations which are assessed elsewhere. The reference SOL documents, which list occupations and contact details of the designated assessing authorities, are available from the DIAC website www. immi. gov. au/sk illed/sol/. Applicants seeking assessment for migration purposes should first get a copy of the latest ‘General Skilled Migration Booklet (6) – Form 1119’ from the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC) (www. mmi. gov. au). This booklet will help applicants understand the requirements for General Skilled Migration to Australia. Alternatively, the ‘Employer Sponsored Migration Booklet (5) – form 1131’ may be relevant. Applicants should refer to the Australian Skills Recognition Information (ASRI) site at www. immi. gov. au/asri. This site helps you to find out how to get an assessment of your occupational qualifications and skills. It also contains information on state specific registration and licensing requirements.Applicants should also refer to the Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) at www. abs. gov. au. This reference provides the definition, skill level and tasks involved in a particular o ccupation. 2. Occupational Categories in Engineering Engineers Australia recognises three occupational categories within the engineering team in Australia: †¢ ProfessionalEngineer †¢ EngineeringTechnologist †¢ EngineeringAssociate For migration purposes, an additional category of Engineering Manager is also recognised.Shown below is a description of the pre-requisite engineering qualifications and the workplace role for each occupational category. 4 SEcTION A 3. Pathways to Recognition There are two pathways to recognition of your qualifications: a) through recognised (accredited) Engineering Qualifications b) through a Competency Demonstration Report (CDR) for non-recognised qualifications. The pathways to recognition are shown schematically below: Read Information on website www. engineersaustralia. org. au download relevant Application formA TRF received before receipt of assessment application is stored alphabetically and matched to the personal file when assessme nt commences. Details of locations where IELTS assessments are conducted may be found on the IELTS website www. ielts. org. The following applicants may be exempt from the requirement to provide an IELTS assessment result: †¢ ApplicantswhoarenativeEnglishspeakers; †¢ ApplicantswhohavecompletedanAustralian undergraduateengineeringqualification; †¢ Applicantswhohavecompleteda2yearMasters degree or PhD program at an Australian university.For the above exemption, documentary evidence is required of successful completion of the Australian degree program. Please note that the above IELTS exemptions are determined on a case by case basis and Engineers Australia reserves the right to require an IELTS assessment result if it is deemed necessary. a) Accredited Qualifications b) Non-Recognised Qualifications Australian Qualifications all three levels washington Accord For Professional Engineers Sydney Accord For Engineering Technologists competency demonstration Report (cdR) 5. Certification of Copies of Documents Accreditation check Re-Submit es No yes No You must provide certified true copies of your original degree/diploma testamur (certificate) and any other subsequent engineering qualifications together with their associated academic transcripts (list of subjects studied and results obtained). Do not send the course syllabus. Certified copies are to be produced direct from the original documents, which the Certifier must sight. An original document is usually different from a photocopy or other reproduction. An original may often contain an official logo, seal, stamp or watermark, or may include a handwritten signature.Please note that colour scanned emailed or facsimile copies are not accepted. The certified copies bearing the Certifier's actual signature must be sent as hardcopy by post (or courier). Where documents are not in the English language, you must provide certified copies of both the original-language document and an English language trans lation which has been made from the original document. All translations must be carried out by an authorised translator. In general translators are not authorised to certify copies of original documents.The signature, name, status and contact details of the translator must be provided on the English language version. If your current name is not the same as that on your degree documents, you must provide evidence of your name change. All submitted documents which are copies of original documents must be certified. Many applications for a skills assessment are delayed because documents are not properly certified. The assessors will contact you by letter or e-mail if there are any omissions in regard to certification. Please make sure your e-mail and contact addresses are up to date.Outcome Outcome Refer to Sections B and C for instructions associated with each pathway. The assessment is primarily focused on the basic tertiary (post secondary) engineering qualification. Any application for assessment of a postgraduate qualification must have an underpinning undergraduate qualification. 4. English Language Requirements All applicants applying to have their skills assessed by Engineers Australia are required to provide evidence of their English language competency. Applicants are required to have achieved a minimum score of 6. in each of the four modules of speaking, listening, reading and writing in either the ‘General Training' or ‘Academic' version of the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) www. ielts. org. Please Note You must arrange for an original IELTS Test Report Form (TRF) to be sent to Engineers Australia directly from the Test Centre. Certified copies are not acceptable. Use the address on the application form – see also page 25. For an IELTS Test Report Form to be valid, it must not be more than 2 years old at the date of receipt of the assessment application in this office. SEcTION A Applicants should note the foll owing points concerning certification of documents: 1. Certified copies of previously certified copies will not be accepted. You must provide a properly certified copy of the ORIGINAL document. 2. Proper certification should appear on each page to be certified, and should show: (a) (b) the signature of the person certifying the document and the date of signing the name of the person certifying the document. This should be clearly printed or evident in the official stamp the contact details of the person certifying the document.This MUST be provided and may be a business address, telephone number or e-mail address, and where possible, an official stamp indicating the status of the person certifying the document, ie. Justice of the Peace, Commissioner for Oaths, Notary Public a statement â€Å"I certify this to be an identical copy of the original document, which I have sighted†, or similar wording Where the name, status and contact details are in a foreign language, an English language translation of these three details needs to be provided. . Steps in the Assessment Application Process This section of the booklet assists you in the preparation and submission of your assessment applications. If you are lodging a Washington Accord, a Sydney Accord, or an Australian Engineering Qualification assessment application, then full details of what to send us are on the relevant application form. Go to Section B for details on preparing an application for assessment of a recognised qualification.Compilation of a Competency Demonstration Report (CDR) If you have non-recognised qualifications, you will need to submit a Competency Demonstration Report (CDR). Section C of this booklet provides you with guidelines for a description of your personal engineering practice and an identification of your engineering competencies. The Competency Demonstration Report or CDR is the substantial component of your application which provides the basis for Engineers Australiaâ€℠¢s assessment of your competencies.Apart from your engineering qualification, the success of your application will depend on your career episodes and your demonstration of the relevant set of competency elements. You should follow the guidelines in Section C carefully when compiling your CDR. Additional assessment services If you require an opinion on a higher level qualification (eg PhD), or your relevant skilled employment for the purpose of claiming points from DIAC, then go to Section D for application details.Note that the standard assessment will include an opinion on the comparable AQF Australian qualification level used in support of the assess outcome. This will enable the relevant points for such to be claimed from DIAC. Checklist of documentation and dispatch Section E of this booklet provides you with checklists of the required material, fees and dispatch address. The current assessment fee is also specified on the relevant application form. (c) (d) (e) (f) 3.The followi ng classes of persons acting within their relevant jurisdiction in the country of certification are authorised to certify copies of documents: †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ AnauthorisedNotaryPublic AnauthorisedCommissionerfor Oaths/Declarations AnauthorisedLawyer,Solicitor,BarristerorJudge AnauthorisedJusticeofthePeace AnofficerofanAustralianDiplomaticPost AcurrentfinancialmemberoftheEngineers Australia other than at the grade of student (membership number must be shown) AstaffmemberofEngineersAustralia †¢ 4. If you employ the services of a legal firm, the solicitor must sign each page.It will not be satisfactory for the name of the law firm to appear in lieu of the actual name and signature of the solicitor certifying your documents. Collective responsibility implied in the use of â€Å"we†, accompanied by the name of the law firm, is not acceptable. 5. Documents are to be certified either in the country of lodgment or in the country of award Please No te Assessment of your application will not proceed if you submit copies of documents where the class of person certifying the copy is not one of those listed above or where the requirements stated above are not complied with. SEcTION A 7. Application Forms Each assessment pathway has its own application form. Make sure you download and complete the application form for the pathway you have selected. Application forms may be downloaded from the website www. engineersaustralia. org. au/migration_skills When applying for a CDR assessment, you should specify the occupational category and field of engineering for which you are seeking an occupational outcome. You may wish to refer to the Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) dictionary on www. abs. gov. u for the definition of the occupations. Use of an Agent If you have appointed a person to act as your agent you must complete the authorisation form, which may be downloaded from the website (www. eng ineersaustralia. org. au/ migration_skills) under ‘Migration Skills Assessment’. If you are appointing an Agent, a hard-copy version of this form, complete with your original signature, must accompany your assessment application. If you employ an agent, Engineers Australia will communicate only with your agent regarding your assessment. You cannot independently contact Engineers Australia.If you do so you will be referred to your agent. 9. Appealing the Assessment Outcome If you are not satisfied with the assessment outcome you should first contact your case officer and discuss your concerns. The case officer may refer your case to the Associate Director – Migration Skills Assessment for consideration. †¢ ARevieworAppealcanonlybemadewithin 12 months of the date of the original assessment outcome letter †¢ Ifyouhavealreadyusedtheassessmentoutcomeletter for Migration purposes, then the assessment process is regarded as finished and no Appeal can be made.T here are two stages to an appeal: Preliminary (Informal) Review On receipt of request for a preliminary review, the Manager will refer your file to another assessor for an assessment which is independent of the first. Preliminary Reviews are done at no charge. You will be advised of the outcome by the Manager. If you are still not satisfied with the outcome you may go to a formal Appeal. Formal Appeal To lodge a formal appeal you must submit the form â€Å"Application for Formal Appeal of Assessment Outcome†, downloadable from www. engineersaustralia. rg. au/ migration_skills You may include reasons as to why you believe the outcome is not appropriate in your case. You cannot however present any new information/evidence. If you wish to add new material to your submission you must make a new application. You must include the Appeal Fee of AUD$200. This fee is refundable if you receive the outcome you are seeking. It is not refundable if the outcome remains as originally assess ed. All documents on your file will be photocopied and forwarded to an external Committee of engineers for re-assessment.Under Australian Privacy Legislation your permission will be required to forward copies of documents to the Committee. When requesting an Appeal, your signature will denote your consent to dissemination of the file documents. Appeals take about three months to process. The outcome of an Appeal is FINAL. 8. The Assessment Process When your application arrives, a receipt will be posted to you within 5 to 7 working days. The receipt will specify your Contact ID (CID) number. Please use this number in correspondence with Engineers Australia. Assessment turnaround time can vary and regular updates are to be found at ww. engineersaustralia. org. au/migration_ skills Please do not telephone Engineers Australia within this timeframe as this will cause delays to processing. If there are any deficiencies in your submission you will be notified in writing. If the application is successful you will receive an assessment outcome letter suitable for migration purposes. Please note that the assessment outcome letter has no expiry date from Engineers Australia’s perspective. Assessment outcome letters are sent by ordinary post. If you wish to use a courier you must organise that yourself.Please advise Engineers Australia if you intend to use a courier and you will be advised by e-mail when the letter is available for pick-up. Please Note Only one original letter of recognition will be issued. Provision of an additional letter will require a Statutory Declaration explaining the reason for the additional letter together with an administration fee of AUD$100. 10. Fraud Applications will be rejected where there is evidence of fraud, plagiarism or forged documents. We refer applicants to the Engineers Australia Code of Ethics, in particular the demonstration of integrity, available on the website www. engineersaustralia. rg. au 7 8 SEcTION B Assessment of Recognised Qualifications 9 SEcTION B Accredited Qualifications These are accredited Australian engineering qualifications and overseas engineering qualifications that are recognised through formal agreements with engineering accreditation bodies in other countries. These qualifications are readily recognisable through database listings of accredited programs. For overseas qualifications there are two pathways †¢ onedealswithundergraduateProfessional Engineering programs. This is known as the Washington Accord. †¢ andtheotherdealswithEngineering Technologist programs. This is known as the Sydney Accord.In general, all references to ‘qualifications' refer to the undergraduate engineering qualification. However, please note that there are some Australian Masters qualifications that are now being accredited. Please Note For all recognized (accredited) qualifications the occupational classification generally given to you will be according to the engineering discipline s pecified in the program title and/or as reflected in the academic content. If you wish to seek an engineering occupational classification other than the one specified in your qualifications, or have your work experience taken into consideration, you will need to submit a CDR.Application forms for these pathways are available from the Engineers Australia website www. engineersaustralia. org. au/migration_skills 2. Washington Accord The Washington Accord (www. washingtonaccord. org) is an agreement between the engineering accreditation bodies, listed below, to recognise as equivalent the undergraduate professional engineering programs of study which are accredited and delivered in those countries. The following countries are full members of the Washington Accord. While Australia is a signatory country it is not listed here.If you have Australian engineering qualifications you must apply using the Australian Qualifications application form. Some other countries are currently seeking fu ll membership of the Washington Accord. Please refer to www. washingtonaccord. org. Provisional membership does not give entitlement to apply under the Washington Accord. Full membership only provides this entitlement. Canada (1989) Ireland (1989) New Zealand (1989) The Canadian Accreditation Board of the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers www. engineerscanada. ca The Institution of Engineers of Ireland www. iei. e The Institution of Professional Engineers, New Zealand www. ipenz. org. nz United Kingdom The Engineering Council of the UK www. engc. org. uk (1989) (see dual degree accreditation note) United States of America (1989) The Engineering Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology www. abet. org 1. Australian Qualifications If you have Australian undergraduate engineering qualifications at the Professional Engineer, Engineering Technologist or Engineering Associate level you should initially apply using the Australian Qualificat ions Application Form.Please note that ONLY accredited Australian qualifications are eligible under this pathway. If your undergraduate engineering qualification is from overseas, and unless your postgraduate (Masters) qualification is FULLY accredited, you cannot apply using this pathway. Persons who hold Australian engineering qualifications at the Trade or Technician level must not apply to Engineers Australia for assessment. Details of the relevant assessing authority for these occupations can be found in the Skilled Occupation Listing (SOL) available from the Department of Immigration and Citizenship www. mmi. gov. au. If your Australian engineering qualification has not yet been awarded you may provide a certified copy of the official academic transcript in lieu of a copy of the actual degree. The transcript must specify that the program of study has been completed and you are eligible to graduate. If the academic transcript does not specify completion you must provide an orig inal letter of completion (not a copy) signed by the Academic Registrar (not someone acting on his/her behalf). Hong Kong SAR The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers www. hkie. org. k (1995) South Africa (1999) Japan (2005) Singapore (2006) South Korea (2007) Taiwan (2007) Malaysia (2009) Turkey (2011) Russia (2012) The Engineering Council of South Africa www. ecsa. co. za Japan Accreditation Board for Engineering Education www. jabee. org The Institution of Engineers Singapore www. ies. org. sg Accreditation Board for Engineering Education for Korea www. abeek. or. kr Institute of Engineering Education Taiwan www. ieet. org. tw Board of Engineers Malaysia www. bem. org. my Association of Evaluation and Accreditation of Engineering Programs www. udek. org. tr Association for Engineering Education of Russia www. ac-raee. ru Please Note The Washington Accord only applies to undergraduate professional engineering degrees accredited and delivered in the signatory countries. The Accord do es not apply to: If you have been given part exemption from an Australian †¢ Qualificationsatloweracademiclevelsor qualification on the basis of recognition of prior learning †¢ Postgraduatequalificationsinengineering. (RPL) at another institution, you will need to provide 10 evidence of that prior learning. SEcTION BYou should first check that your qualification is listed as an accredited Professional Engineering program with the relevant body before applying. Washington Accord accreditation applies for degrees completed on or after the year (shown in brackets) for full signatory status. If you consider your qualifications fall under the Washington Accord you should complete the Washington Accord application form and provide the required documentation and assessment fee. Your qualifications will be checked with the relevant Washington Accord accreditation body.If your qualification is not listed as accredited under the Washington Accord, you will be invited to submit a Co mpetency Demonstration Report (CDR). Please Note Applicants with accredited qualifications from signatory countries where the official language is not English will be required to submit a satisfactory IELTS assessment result. Please Note The Sydney Accord only applies to undergraduate engineering technologist qualifications accredited and delivered in the signatory countries. The Accord does not apply to: †¢ Qualificationsatloweracademiclevelsor †¢ Postgraduatequalificationsinengineering.You should first check that your qualification is listed as an accredited Engineering Technologist program with the relevant body before applying. Sydney Accord accreditation applies for degrees completed on or after the year (shown in brackets) for full signatory status. If you consider your qualifications fall under the Sydney Accord you should complete the Sydney Accord application form and provide the required documentation and assessment fee. Your qualifications will be checked with t he relevant Sydney Accord accreditation body.If your qualification is not listed as accredited under the Sydney Accord, you will be invited to submit a Competency Demonstration Report (CDR). Please Note Applicants with accredited qualifications from signatory countries where the official language is not English will be required to submit a satisfactory IELTS assessment result. 3. Sydney Accord The Sydney Accord is an agreement between the engineering accreditation bodies, listed below, to recognise as equivalent the Engineering Technologist programs of study which are accredited and delivered in those countries.The following countries are full members of the Sydney Accord. While Australia is a signatory country it is not listed here. If you have Australian qualifications you must apply using the Australian qualifications application form. Canada (2001) The Canadian Council of Technicians and Technologists www. cctt. ca Hong Kong SAR The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers (2001) www. hkie. org. hk Ireland (2001) New Zealand (2001) South Africa (2001) The Institution of Engineers of Ireland www. iei. ie The Institution of Professional Engineers, New Zealand www. ipenz. org. nz The Engineering Council of South Africa www. csa. co. za United Kingdom The Engineering Council of the UK (2001) www. engc. org. uk (see dual degree accreditation note) United States of America (2009) The Engineering Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology www. abet. org Provisional membership does not give entitlement to apply under the Sydney Accord. Full membership only provides this entitlement. 11 12 Section c Assessment of Non-Recognised Qualifications 13 SEcTION c 1. Introduction This section deals with the compilation of a Competency Demonstration Report (CDR) describing your engineering practice.The purpose of the CDR is to demonstrate: †¢ howyouhaveappliedyourengineeringknowledgeand skills; †¢ thatsuchapplicationmeetsthecompete ncystandards of the relevant occupational category in Australia. You should be aware that the CDR must be all your own work. You must carefully follow the instructions provided in preparing your CDR. You should realise that you are entering into a final assessment. The major assessable features of the CDR are your narratives written in English of three career episodes and a Summary Statement of the competency elements you have claimed.You should, where possible, type your CDR using a word processor and remember to keep a copy. The CDR must not be bound but presented in loose leaf A4 format. Your CDR will be assessed against the competency standards of the occupational category specified by you. Engineers Australia will not assess your competencies against an occupational category higher than the one you have specified, but may consider assessment against a lower occupational category if you are assessed as not suitable for your nominated category.Please Note A submitted CDR which is incomplete when submitted or which does not meet the stated requirements will not be assessed. All submitted material becomes the property of Engineers Australia. Applicants must make copies of all documents sent to Engineers Australia. Applicants who request copies of their submitted documents will be charged a AUD$100 administration fee. Do not present documents in a bound format as they must be dismantled for filing. 2. Steps in preparing a CDR:The flow chart below shows the steps you need to take in preparing your CDR: Complete Application Form Assemble certified copies of academic testamur(s) and associated academic transcript(s) Prepare Curriculum Vitae Identify Continuing Professional Development Write three Career Episodes Prepare a Summary Statement of evidence for the competency elements Instruct IElTS Test Entre to post an original TRF to EA Submit all specified documentation to Engineers Australia for assessment 3. Components of the CDR: You must first complete the CDR Application Form. This is available from www. engineersaustralia. org. au/ migration_skills 3. Declaration Page Your Competency Demonstration Report must include the following declaration (shown below). Declaration: The following declaration must be signed and presented as part of your CDR submission: ‘All statements of fact in this report are true and correct and I have made claims of acquired competencies in good faith. The report is all my own work and is a true representation of my personal competence in written English. I confirm that I understand that members of the engineering team in Australia are required to display a commitment to exercising professional and ethical responsibility in all aspects of their work.I also understand that documentation submitted in support of my application may be referred to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC) for integrity checking. ’ Printed Name: Signature: Date: This Declaration Form is on page 3 of the CDR Appl ication Form, which may be downloaded from the Engineers Australia website www. engineersaustralia. org. au/ migration_skills 14 SEcTION c 3. 2 Certified copies of qualifications and academic record(s) Certified copies of the testamur (degree certificate) and transcript are mandatory documents.Many applications for a skills assessment are delayed because documents are not properly certified. See item 5 of Section A for full details of the certification requirements. Documents not properly certified will not be accepted, and your application for assessment will not proceed. Evidence must be provided of any postgraduate qualification completion, or at least enrolment if qualification not completed. This is especially important if material from such study is used in one or more career episode. 3. Curriculum Vitae (CV) or Resume Engineers Australia requires a full summary of your education and engineering work history to gain a full perspective of your engineering workplace practice. Yo ur CV must be a complete record of your activities and must not contain significant periods where no activity is recorded. For each workplace provide: †¢ organisationnameandlocationincludingcontact details where possible †¢ datesanddurationofemployment †¢ titleofpositionoccupiedbyyou †¢ yourdefinedrole(provideadutyorappointment statement where available) and/or a brief description of your activities Your CV should be no more than three A4 pages.The CV is to be a chronological listing of employment, not projects. 3. 4 Evidence of Employment If in your CV/Resume you claim engineering work experience of 12 months or more, then you must provide documentary evidence (originals or certified copies) of employment and certified translations into English where necessary. Thedocumentaryevidenceistoinclude;company letterhead (including name and location details), date of document, name and status of author, dates and duration of employment, title of position occupied and a brief description of duties/tasks/responsibilities.If a career episode is based upon engineering work, then you must provide documentary evidence of employment, as above. This instruction applies to the standard assessment service only. Go to Section D for further instructions on the additional assessment service for the identification of periods of skilled employment. 3. 5 Identification of Continuing Professional Development Continuing Professional Development (CPD) is the means by which you keep up-to-date with developments in your field of engineering after you have gained your undergraduate qualification. A brief summary of CPD you have undertaken must be included in your CDR.This CPD must take the form of a listing (title, date, duration, venue) of: †¢ formalpost-graduatestudy; †¢ conferencesatwhichyouhavedeliveredpapersor attended. †¢ shortcourses,workshops,seminarsanddiscussion groups, conferences, technical inspections and technicalmeetingsyouhaveattended; â € ¢ preparationandpresentationofmaterialforcourses, conferences, seminars and symposia †¢ servicetotheengineeringprofession(volunteerwork, board or committee volunteer, mentoring, etc) †¢ privatestudy(includesbooks,journals,transactions, manuals, etc) Your CPD listing need be no more than one A4 page. There is no necessity to include certificates from each course. . 6 International English Language Test Result All applicants applying to have their skills assessed by Engineers Australia are required to provide evidence of their English language competency. See item 4 of Section A for full details of the English competency requirements. 3. 7 Writing your three career episodes You are required to present an account of your engineering activities on each of three separate career episodes. A career episode is a documented component of your engineering education and/or work experience which captures a particular period or distinct aspect of your engineering activity.It needs t o clearly demonstrate the application of engineering knowledge and skills in the nominated occupation, not the acquisition of knowledge. It may use material from: †¢ anengineeringtaskundertakenaspartofyour educationalprogram; †¢ aprojectyouhaveworkedonorarecurrently workingon; †¢ aspecificpositionthatyouoccupiedorcurrently occupy (in this case, the career episode must comprise morethanameredutystatement); †¢ aparticularengineeringproblemthatyouwererequired to solve. Each career episode must be in your own words and must be written in English. 5 SEcTION c Do not present large amounts of technical material. It is recommended that each narrative be a minimum of about 1000 words and a maximum of about 2000 words. The career episode, being written in your own words, will also provide evidence to the assessor of your communication skills. Please Note Career Episodes must be written in the first person singular clearly indicating your own personal role in the work descr ibed. Remember, it is what ‘I did’, not what ‘we did’ or what ‘I was involved in. Each career episode must clearly demonstrate the application of engineering knowledge and skills in the engineering discipline for which the applicant seeks recognition. That is, state â€Å"what you did† and describe â€Å"how you did it†, with emphasis on your own personal actions, eg â€Å"I designed†¦ â€Å", â€Å"I investigated†¦ â€Å". Excessive technical detail (diagrams, photos, calculations, tables) are not required. Each career episode should emphasise any engineering problems identified and any particular problem solving techniques used by you.The purpose of this is to assess the nature of the contribution which you may have made to the engineering project or task – particularly if that contribution was of a novel nature or critical to the implementation of the task/project. Please note that it is not sufficient to merely d escribe work in which you were involved. Your own role in the work must be clearly described by you, and be identifiable in the assessment. You must number each paragraph in each of your career episodes. Thefollowingsystemisrecommended; Career episode 1 (paragraphs 1. 1, 1. 2, 1. 3 etc) Career episode 2 (paragraphs 2. , 2. 2, 2. 3 etc) Career episode 3 (paragraphs 3. 1, 3. 2, 3. 3 etc) This is necessary to construct the Summary Statement. Each career episode should follow the format shown below: a) Introduction (approx. 50 words) This introduces the reader to the career episode and should include such things as: †¢ thechronology-thedatesanddurationofthiscareer episode; †¢ thegeographicallocationwheretheexperiencewas gained; †¢ thenameoftheorganisation; †¢ thetitleofthepositionoccupiedbyyou. b) Background (200 – 500 words) This sets the scene and provides the context in which you were studying/working.It should include such things as: †¢ thenatureofthe overallengineeringproject; †¢ theobjectivesoftheproject; †¢ thenatureofyourparticularworkarea; †¢ achartoftheorganisationalstructurehighlighting yourposition,inrelationtothecareerepisode; †¢ astatementofyourduties(provideanofficialduty statement where available). c) Personal Engineering Activity (500 – 1000 words) This is the body of the narrative and the key assessable component. In this section you must describe in detail the actual work performed by you. It is not sufficient to describe the activity performed by a team or group – your own role must be clearly identified.Remember it is your own personal engineering competencies that are being assessed. This section should include such things as: †¢ howyouappliedyourengineeringknowledgeandskills; †¢ thetasksdelegatedtoyouandhowyouwentabout accomplishingthem; †¢ anyparticulartechnicaldifficulties/problemsyou encounteredandhowyousolvedthem; †¢ strategiesdevisedbyyouincludinganyori ginalor creativedesignwork; †¢ howyouworkedwithotherteammembers. d) Summary (50 – 100 words) This section sums up your impressions of the engineering activity and your role in it.It should include such things as: †¢ yourviewoftheoverallproject; †¢ howtheprojectfaredinmeetingthegoals/requirements; †¢ howyourpersonalrolecontributedtotheproject. 3. 8 Preparation of the Summary Statement Complete the three career episodes, then analyse them for the presence of ALL of the competency elements for the occupational category you have chosen. The elements for each occupational category are listed in the following pages. The Appendix gives a detailed description of each competency element for each category. 16 SEcTION cThe results of your analysis are to be reported in the form of a Summary Statement of competency elements claimed. The Summary Statement cross-references the relevant set of competency elements with the particular paragraph in your Career Episode where each element occurs. To do this, you will need to number the paragraphs in your career episodes. The process is represented schematically below: 1. Career Episode 2. Career Episode 3. Career Episode Summary Statement of competency elements claimed by you indicating how and where appliedYou must download and complete the appropriate summary statement for your nominated occupational category. The summary statement templates are available at www. engineersaustralia. org. au/migration_skills These are guides only. Do not attempt to restrict your Summary Statement to one page only. Applicants may prepare their own summary table, but must include the complete set of competency elements for their nominated engineering category. Please note, one Summary Statement only is to be provided covering all three career episodes combined. 17 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Summary Statement These are the competency Units and Elements.These elements must be addressed in the Summary Statement (see Section C). If you are applying for assessment as a Professional Engineer, you will need to download this page, complete it and lodge it with your application. For details, refer to the Appendix, Pages 33-36. Competency Element PE1 KNOWLEDGE AND SKILL BASE A brief summary of how you have applied the element Paragraph in the career episode(s) where the element is addressed PE1. 1 Comprehensive, theory based understanding of the underpinning natural and physical sciences and the engineering fundamentals applicable to the engineering discipline.PE1. 2 Conceptual understanding of the mathematics, numerical analysis, statistics, and computer and information sciences which underpin the engineering discipline. PE1. 3 In-depth understanding of specialist bodies of knowledge within the engineering discipline. PE1. 4 Discernment of knowledge development and research directions within the engineering discipline. PE1. 5 Knowledge of contextual factors impacting the engineering discipline. PE1. 6 Understand ing of the scope, principles, norms, accountabilities and bounds of contemporary engineering practice in the specific discipline.PE2 ENGINEERING APPLICATION ABILITY PE2. 1 Application of established engineering methods to complex engineering problem solving. PE2. 2 Fluent application of engineering techniques, tools and resources. PE2. 3 Application of systematic engineering synthesis and design processes. PE2. 4 Application of systematic approaches to the conduct and management of engineering projects. PE3 PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES PE3. 1 Ethical conduct and professional accountability. PE3. 2 Effective oral and written communication in professional and lay domains. PE3. Creative, innovative and pro-active demeanour. PE3. 4 Professional use and management of information. PE3. 5 Orderly management of self, and professional conduct. PE3. 6 Effective team membership and team leadership. 18 ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIST Summary Statement These are the competency Units and Element s. These elements must be addressed in the Summary Statement (see Section C). If you are applying for assessment as an Engineering Technologist, you will need to download this page, complete it, and lodge it with your application. For details, refer to the Appendix, Pages 38-41.Competency Element ET1 KNOWLEDGE AND SKILL BASE A brief summary of how you have applied the element Paragraph in the career episode(s) where the element is addressed ET1. 1 Systematic, theory based understanding of the underpinning natural and physical sciences and the engineering fundamentals applicable to the technology domain. ET1. 2 Conceptual understanding of the, mathematics, numerical analysis, statistics, and computer and information sciences which underpin the technology domain. ET1. 3 In-depth understanding of specialist bodies of knowledge within the technology domain. ET1. Discernment of knowledge development within the technology domain. ET1. 5 Knowledge of contextual factors impacting the techno logy domain. ET1. 6 Understanding of the scope, principles, norms, accountabilities and bounds of contemporary engineering practice in the technology domain. ET2 ENGINEERING APPLICATION ABILITY ET2. 1 Application of established engineering methods to broadly-defined problem solving within the technology domain. ET2. 2 Application of engineering techniques, tools and resources within the technology domain. ET2. 3 Application of systematic synthesis and design processes within the technology domain.ET2. 4 Application of systematic approaches to the conduct and management of projects within the technology domain. ET3 PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES ET3. 1 Ethical conduct and professional accountability. ET3. 2 Effective oral and written communication in professional and lay domains. ET3. 3 Creative, innovative and pro-active demeanour. ET3. 4 Professional use and management of information. ET3. 5 Orderly management of self, and professional conduct. ET3. 6 Effective team membershi p and team leadership. 19 ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE Summary Statement These are the competency Units and Elements.These elements must be addressed in the Summary Statement (see Section C). If you are applying for assessment as an Engineering Associate, you will need to download this page, complete it, and lodge it with your application. For details, refer to the Appendix, Pages 43-45. Competency Element EA1 KNOWLEDGE AND SKILL BASE A brief summary of how you have applied the element Paragraph in the career episode(s) where the element is addressed EA1. 1 Descriptive, formula-based understanding of the underpinning natural and physical sciences and the engineering fundamentals applicable to the practice area.EA1. 2 Procedural-level understanding of the mathematics, numerical analysis, statistics, and computer and information sciences which underpin the practice area. EA1. 3 In-depth practical knowledge and skills within specialist sub-disciplines of the practice area. EA1. 4 Discernment of engineering developments within the practice area. EA1. 5 Knowledge of contextual factors impacting the practice area. EA1. 6 Understanding of the scope, principles, norms, accountabilities and bounds of contemporary engineering practice in the area of practice. EA2 ENGINEERING APPLICATION ABILITYEA2. 1 Application of established technical and practical methods to the solution of well-defined engineering problems. EA2. 2 Application of technical and practical techniques, tools and resources to well-defined engineering problems. EA2. 3 Application of systematic design processes to well-defined engineering problems. EA2. 4 Application of systematic project management processes. EA3 PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES EA3. 1 Ethical conduct and professional accountability. EA3. 2 Effective oral and written communication in professional and lay domains.EA3. 3 Creative, innovative and pro-active demeanour. EA3. 4 Professional use and management of information. EA3. 5 Orderly manageme nt of self, and professional conduct. EA3. 6 Effective team membership and team leadership. 20 ENGINEERING MANAGER Summary Statement These are the competency Elements. These elements must be addressed in the Summary Statement (see Section C). If you are applying for assessment as an Engineering Manager, you will need to download this page, complete it, and lodge it with your application. For details, refer to the Appendix, Page 47.Competency Element EM1. 1 Contributes to engineering business strategies EM1. 2 Develops client relationships EM1. 3 Manages the implementation of engineering plans within the business EM1. 4 Manages resources EM1. 5 Manages people EM1. 6 Manages suppliers EM1. 7 Manages business information EM1. 8 Monitors engineering business performance A brief summary of how you have applied the element Paragraph in the career episode(s) where the element is addressed 21 22 Section d Additional Assessment Services 23 SEcTION d Additional Assessment ServicesIdentificati on of: – Relevant Engineering Qualifications; and / or – Relevant Skilled Employment for the purpose of claiming migration points 2. Applicability of additional services It should be noted that not all clients will require these additional assessing services. Such services are anticipated to be ONLY of interest to the following clients: †¢ thosewhoholdahigher-levelqualificationthanmaybe strictlynecessarytoprovidethenominatedoutcome; and / or †¢ thosewhohaveatleast1yearAustralianwork experience, and / or at least 3 years Overseas work experience in their nominated occupation or a closelyrelated occupation.Either or both of these services may be applied for if the client wishes to claim the DIAC points. 1. Introduction As part of the introduction of the New Points Test for certain skilled migration visas on 1 July 2011, DIAC has advised applicants that they may request an opinion from their relevant assessing authority in two areas: †¢ identificationofhigh esteducationalqualification, relevant to the nominated occupation †¢ identificationofrelevantworkexperienceofatleast 20hrs/week, both overseas and in Australia See http://www. immi. gov. au/skilled/general-skilledmigration/pdf/points-test. df Generally, the higher the level of qualification and the longer the period of relevant work experience, the greater the number of points claimable under the points test. Engineers Australia can offer opinions in the two areas above, as necessary, on receipt of an application for the additional services (with evidence) over and above the standard assessment. It should be noted that – from 1 July 2011 – the standard assessment WILL INCLUDE an opinion on the comparable relevant Australian level qualification to the client’s overseas qualification used in support of the assessed outcome.However, where a client holds an engineering PhD degree for example, which may not necessarily need to be considered in the assessment pro cess to provide the nominated outcome, then this additional assessing service may be employed to identify the overseas PhD as comparable to an Australian PhD. Please Note Engineers Australia does NOT issue the points for migration. This will be done by the DIAC case officer at the time of their review of the overall migration application, subsequent to assessment. 3.Identification of higher level engineering qualifications The standard assessment WILL INCLUDE an opinion on the comparable relevant Australian level qualification to the client’s overseas qualification used in support of the assessed outcome. However, where a client holds a PhD degree for example, which may not necessarily need to be considered in the assessment process to provide the nominated outcome, then this additional assessing service may be employed to identify the overseas PhD as comparable to an Australian PhD.Applicants who require this service will need to provide: †¢ acompletedapplicationform,wi threlevantfee payment †¢ properly-certifiedcopiesofalloriginalacademic documentation (testamurs and transcripts, as applicable) which shows that the client unconditionally holds the qualification claimed †¢ alistingofdoctoralexaminersanddetails †¢ alistingofpublicationsmadeduringandafterthe doctoral program †¢ thesisabstract. 4. Skilled EmploymentDIAC will award points to applicants based on demonstration of a verifiable skilled employment history undertaken in the last 10 years, in Australia or overseas. For the necessary assessment by Engineers Australia, the experience MUST be in an applicant’s nominated engineering occupation, or a closely related occupation. In determining whether an applicant’s skilled employment is closely related to their nominated occupation, the assessment by Engineers Australia will take into consideration the occupations within one unit group 4 SEcTION d classified under the ANZSCO Classification of Occupations. Engineer s Australia has been authorised by DIAC to provide an opinion about an applicant’s skilled employment claims as part of the skills assessment. However, the decision to award points for skilled employment remains with the DIAC case officer, who may also need to review claims of relevant employment gained subsequent to the formal assessment.For applicants seeking an opinion about their skilled employment claims (as above) from Engineers Australia, submitted work experience documentation must: †¢ beanoriginaldocument,oracertifiedtruecopyofthe original in accordance with the MSA Booklet, Section A,Item5; †¢ bewrittenontheofficialletterheadofthecompany,or governmentdepartment,providingthedocumentation; †¢ indicateclearlythefulladdressofthecompanyand any telephone, fax numbers, email and website addresses; †¢ bedated; †¢ includethenameandpositionofthepersonendorsing the employment document †¦ these should be typed or stamped below that person's signatu re – a reference with an illegible signature will not be accepted: †¢ includethedirectcontactnumberandofficialemail addressofthepersonendorsingthedocument; †¢ indicate: – the main five (5) duties undertaken, – the job title or positions held (positions should not be described by generic titles (eg, Engineer) but according to the nature of the duties undertaken (eg, Assistant Project Engineer – Civil), – the exact period of employment (start and finish date, including day/month/year), – whether full or part-time (including hours/week). For periods of self-employment, the following certified copies or original documents may be acceptable: – commissions that are signed by each of the clients foreachproject; – proof of formal Registration (including duration) as an engineerinthehomecountry; -receiptsissuedforprojects; – third party confirmation of the period of selfemployment, the position held and the individual d uties performed. Only those documents meeting the above requirements will be considered in the provision of formal written advice by Engineers Australia. No further correspondence will be entered into in addressing shortcomings in the submitted documentation.In addition to the above independent confirmation of the claims made, applicants who require this service will need to provide: †¢ acompletedapplicationform,withrelevantfee payment †¢ acompeted'SkilledEmploymentRecord'ofthework experience being claimed in support of the opinion requested from Engineers Australia. The ‘Skilled Employment Record' template is available on www. engineersaustralia. org. au/migration_skills 25 Skilled Employment Record Family or Surname: Given Names: Employer / Company Name Street Address Contact Details Documents include 5 main duties Yes / No Years / Months CID Number Hours/week Total Duration For Engineers Australia Use Only Start Date End Date Job Title Tel / fax / emailSkilled Emp loyment Record to be downloaded and completed as part of the additional assessment service: 26 Note: Please ensure that all columns are completed for each period of employment relevant to your nominated occupation. SEcTION d Employment for which incomplete information is provided will not be considered. Section E checklists, fee payment and dispatch 27 SEcTION E 1. Checklists Before you dispatch your application you should use one of the following checklists to ensure that you have completed all the necessary steps and provided all the required documents. Assemble your submission by placing documents in the order shown below. Please do not bind your documents.Checklist 1: for Washington/Sydney Accord and Australian Engineering Qualifications Assessment Applications Completed Application Form, with passport-style photo Application fee Form to appoint person to act as agent [if necessary] Certified true copy of passport bio-data page only (not the complete passport), and English langu age translation (if not in English) [Where this is not available, a copy of your Birth Certificate and/or National Identify Card may be acceptable in lieu] Certified true copy of name change document [If necessary] Original English language test (IELTS) result [necessary only if application is based on a qualification from a signatory country where the official language is not English]. You must arrange for this to be forwarded directly to Engineers Australia from theTest Centre Certified true copy of academic testamur Certified true copies of academic transcripts Curriculum Vitae (CV) / Resume English language translations of above, where applicable Checklist 2: for Competency Demonstration Report (CDR) Assessment Applications Completed Application Form, with passport-style photo Application fee Form to appoint person to act as agent [if necessary] Certified true copy of passport bio-data page only (not the complete passport), and English language translation (if not in English) [W here this is not available, a copy of your Birth Certificate and/or National Identify Card may be acceptable in lieu] Certified true copy of name change document [If necessary] Original English language test (IELTS) result [if necessary]. You must arrange for this to be forwarded directly to Engineers Australia from the Test Centre. Curriculum Vitae (CV) / Resume Certified true copy of academic testamur(s) Certified true copies of academic transcript(s) Certified evidence of registration under the relevant licensing authority in the country in which you are practising [if necessary] e. g.Philippine Regulations Commission Certified documentary evidence of employment [must be provided if you have relevant work experience of 12 months or more, or if the work experience provides a basis of a career episode(s)] A listing of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) CDR Declaration Page Three Career Episodes Summary Statement of evidence for the competency elements English language transl ations of above, where applicable 28 SEcTION E 2. Fee Payment and Dispatch The assessment fee as specified on the Application Form must accompany your submission. The assessment fee is not refundable and may be subject to change without notice. Goods and Service Tax (GST) †¢ ApplicantswhoarelivinginAustraliaMUSTpay10% GST on the application fee †¢ Applicantslivingoverseas,wholodgetheirapplication from overseas, are NOT required to pay the GST †¢ Applicants living overseas, who lodge an application for assessment through an agent in Australia (Migration Agent, relative or friend living in Australia) are NOT required to pay the GST.Assessment Fees Assessment fees are listed below for each type of application: Australian qualifications AUD$150 or $165 incl. GST Washington Accord Sydney Accord AUD$300 or $330 incl. GST AUD$300 or $330 incl. GST For payment made within Australia, the following methods of payment are acceptable: †¢ Abankchequeorapersonalcheque †¢ AnAustralianmoneyorder †¢ Acreditcardauthorisationasabove Your completed Application Form, submission, and assessment fee should be sent direct to: Migration Skills Assessment Education and Assessment Engineers Australia 11 National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600 AUSTRALIA Please Note Assessment Turnaround Time: The turnaround time for processing assessments can vary, depending on numbers of incoming applications.For guidance on current turnaround time, we refer to www. engineersaustralia. org. au/migration_skills Please DO NOT contact Engineers Australia within this time frame as delays will be caused to the processing time for all applications. Competency Demonstration Report AUD$600 or $660 incl. GST Additional Services (when applied for at the time of above standard assessment): Skilled Employment Overseas PhD AUD$250 or $275 incl. GST AUD$200 or $220 incl. GST Note that extra fees are applicable for the additional services if carried out AFTER the Standard Assessment has been iss ued. In this case, please refer to the Admin Fee payment form for the applicable fees.The following methods of payment are acceptable: †¢ Aninternationalbankdraftorchequemadeoutto ‘Engineers Australia’ in Australian dollars drawn on an Australian office of a bank operating in Australia †¢ Aninternationalmoneyordermadeoutto‘Engineers Australia’ in Australian dollars †¢ AcreditcardauthorisationonyourVisa,Mastercard or American Express card Please Note A cheque/remittance drawn in a currency other than Australian dollars or drawn in Australian currency on a bank outside Australia is not acceptable. 29 30 Appendix detailed description of competency Elements for each Occupational category 31 AppENdIx PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF ROLE Professional Engineers are required to take responsibility for engineering projects and programs in the most far-reaching sense.This includes the reliable functioning of all materials, components, sub- systems andtechnologiesused;theirintegrationtoforma complete,sustainableandself-consistentsystem;and all interactions between the technical system and the context within which it functions. The latter includes understanding the requirements of clients, wide rangingstakeholdersandofsocietyasawhole; working to optimise social, environmental and economic outcomes over the full lifetime of the engineering product orprogram;interactingeffectivelywithotherdisciplines, professionsandpeople;andensuringthattheengineering contribution is properly integrated into the totality of the undertaking.Professional Engineers are responsible for interpreting technological possibilities to society, businessandgovernment;andforensuringasfaras possible that policy decisions are properly informed by such possibilities and consequences, and that costs, risks and limitations are properly understood as the desirable outcomes. Professional Engineers are responsible for bringing knowledge to bear from multiple sources to develop solutions to complex problems and issues, for ensuring that technical and non-technical considerations are properly integrated, and for managing risk as well as sustainability issues. While the outcomes of engineering have physical forms, the work of Professional Engineers is predominantly intellectual in nature. In a technical sense, Professional Engineers are primarily concerned with the advancement of technologies and with the development of new

Reed v. Town of Gilbert Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact

In Reed v. Town of Gilbert, the Supreme Court considered whether local regulations governing the content of signs in Gilbert, Arizona, violated the First Amendment. The Court found that the sign regulations were content-based restrictions on free speech, and could not survive strict scrutiny. Fast Facts: Reed v. Town of Gilbert Supreme Court Case Case Argued: January 12, 2015Decision Issued: June 18, 2015Petitioner: Clyde ReedRespondent: Town of Gilbert, ArizonaKey Questions: Did the Town of Gilberts sign code impose content-based regulations that violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments? Did the regulations pass the strict scrutiny test?Majority Decision: Justices Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, and KaganDissenting: Unanimous decisionRuling: The Supreme Court found that the Town of Gilberts sign regulations included content-based restrictions on free speech. The restrictions imposed on Clyde Reed and the organization he represented were unconstitutional, as they could not pass the strict scrutiny test. However, the Court warned that strict scrutiny should only be used when there is a risk that officials are suppressing ideas and political debates. Facts of the Case In 2005, town officials in Gilbert, Arizona, passed a law to regulate signage in public spaces. In general, the sign code prohibited public signs, but identified 23 exceptions to the prohibitions. After the sign code went into effect, Gilbert’s sign code compliance manager began citing a local church for violating the code. Good News Community Church was a small congregation without an official place of worship that often met in elementary schools or other public locations around the town. In order to get the word out about services, members would post 15-20 signs at busy intersections and other locations around town on Saturdays and remove them the following day. The sign code manager cited Good News Community Church twice for their signs. The first infraction was for exceeding the amount of time a sign could be publicly displayed. The second infraction cited the church for the same issue, and noted that no date had been listed on the sign. Officials confiscated one of the signs which the pastor, Clyde Reed, had to pick up in person. After failing to reach an agreement with town officials, Mr. Reed and the church filed a complaint in the  United States District Court for the District of Arizona. They alleged that the strict sign code had abridged their freedom of speech, violating the First and Fourteenth Amendments. First Amendment Background Under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, states cannot make laws that abridge an individuals freedom of speech. In Police Dept. of Chicago v. Mosley, the Supreme Court interpreted this clause, finding that states and municipal governments could not restrict speech based on  its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content. This means that if a state or municipal government wants to ban speech based on its content, that ban has to survive a test called strict scrutiny. The entity has to show that the law is narrowly tailored and serves a compelling state interest. Constitutional Issue Did the sign code restrictions qualify as content-based exclusions of free speech? Did the code stand up to strict scrutiny? Did officials in Gilbert Arizona abridge freedom of speech when they enforced the sign code restrictions on church members? Arguments The church argued that the its signs were treated differently than other signs based on their content. More specifically, the attorney argued, the town regulated the sign based on the fact that it was directing people to an event rather than communicating a political message or abstract idea. The sign code was a content-based restriction, and therefore must be subjected to strict scrutiny, he argued. On the other hand, the town argued that the sign code was content-neutral. The town could distinguish between the signs by categorizing them into groups without  reference to the content of the regulated speech.† According to the attorney, the code regulating temporary directional signs could not be considered content-based because the regulation did not favor or suppress viewpoints or ideas. The attorney argued that the code could survive strict scrutiny because the town has a compelling interest in traffic safety and preserving aesthetic appeal. Majority Opinion The Supreme Court unanimously found in favor of Reed. Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the court focusing on three sign code exceptions: Ideological signsPolitical signsTemporary directional signs relating to a qualifying event The sign code exceptions classified signs based on what type of language they displayed, the majority found. A town official would need to read a sign and judge it based on its content in order to decide whether it should be permitted or not. Therefore, the justices argued, parts of the sign code were content-based restrictions on their face. Justice Thomas wrote: A law that is content based on its face is subject to strict scrutiny regardless of the government’s benign motive, content-neutral justification, or lack of â€Å"animus toward the ideas contained† in the regulated speech.† Aesthetic appeal and traffic safety were not compelling enough interests to support the code. The court found no aesthetic difference between a political sign and a temporary directional sign. Both could be equally damaging to the image of the town, but the town chose to impose harsher limitations on the temporary directional signs. Similarly, political signs are just as threatening to traffic safety as ideological signs. Therefore, the justices opined that the law could not survive strict scrutiny. The court noted that some of the town’s restrictions on size, material, portability, and lighting have nothing to do with content, as long as they are applied uniformly, and could survive the strict scrutiny test. Concurring Opinions Justice Samuel Alito concurred, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Anthony Kennedy. Justice Alito agreed with the court; however, he cautioned against interpreting all sign codes as content-based restrictions, offering a list of regulations that could be content neutral. Justice Elena Kagan also wrote a concurrence, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. Justice Kagan argued that the Supreme Court should be wary of applying strict scrutiny to all sign regulations. Strict scrutiny should only be used when there is a risk that officials are suppressing ideas and political debates. Impact In the aftermath of Reed v. Town of Gilbert, towns across the U.S. reevaluated their sign regulations to ensure that they were content-neutral. Under Reed, content-based restrictions are not unlawful, but are subject to strict scrutiny, meaning that a town must be able to show that the restrictions are narrowly tailored and serve a compelling interest. Sources Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 576 U.S. (2015).Reed et al. v. Town of Gilbert, Arizona et al. Oyez.org